The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise appearances before the Louisiana Senate for Friday's hearing on prohibited gambling.

No, they weren't personally in attendance, however the world-famous celebs were conspicuously consisted of in a slide discussion on social and sweepstakes gambling establishments - the controversial websites offering both complimentary casino-style games and financially rewarding prizes, such as money, present cards or cryptocurrency. In one advertisement, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anybody can 'play for complimentary,' while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.

The sites are simply 2 cogs in the multibillion-dollar market that now finds itself besieged by lawsuits. In the eyes of many gaming corporations, not to discuss suit plaintiffs and state regulators, sweepstakes casinos serve as conventional gambling establishments, just without the oversight, customer securities and tax laws. So not just can they avoid the steep 24-percent federal sports betting levy, however sweepstakes operators aren't subject to regulatory difficulties like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming protections.

One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in profits last year alone. Now the company faces accusations of illegal gambling in a New york city claim that declares VGW utilizes celeb endorsers to 'create a veneer of authenticity' around its product. (See VGW's statement listed below)

'I'm unsure" if you don't trust us, you can trust Paris Hilton" is a winning message for business operating multibillion-dollar prohibited operations out of locations like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,' Friday's speaker, Howard Glaser of gaming corporation Light & Wonder, informed DailyMail.com.

Sweepstakes endorsers include a variety of celebrities from sports betting enthusiasts Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, along with NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George - none of whom offer any differences in between conventional sports betting and sweepstakes play.

Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, among numerous sweepstakes gambling establishments found online

Ryan Seacrest advises fans to play at Chumba Casino, where numerous - however not all - video games are totally free

Drake has a deal with social sweeps gambling establishment, Stake, that he regularly touts on social media

Find out more

Donald Trump 'set to name NBA team owner as US ambassador to Italy'

Instead, advertisements generally center around the social element of the gambling establishments, while omitting the potential for real gaming losses.

Others tempt clients with guarantees of rewards. One such operator, Stake, ran a social networks ad showing off Drake's automobiles, airplanes and estates before rotating to video footage of the rap artist playing online casino-style games.

'Daddy, why do we have a lot money?' read the first caption on the screen.

Another caption described: 'Because I never ever quit.'

The inconsistency in between gambling sites and social or sweepstakes casinos is a bit complicated, but operators of the latter insist they're not included with the previous.

A representative for a market trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), described its members are not in direct competition with online casinos and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA information, the majority of the gamers on social-sweepstakes casinos are playing for totally free.

'Most social sweeps clients never buy,' the SPGA spokesperson informed DailyMail.com. 'The minority of clients who make purchases do so in quantities far smaller sized than the common deposit or bet size at real-money online gambling websites.'

Social casinos provide customers an opportunity to play casino-style games with good friends. Players have the alternative to purchase worthless currency frequently described as 'gold coins,' which can not be exchanged for genuine money, however can be utilized to unlock various features within the games.

But within the world of social gambling establishments exists sweepstakes gaming, enabling consumers to acquire other currency referred to as 'sweeps coins' that can be exchanged for money or other rewards.

And therein lies the capacity for monetary losses, like the ones declared by plaintiffs in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York City. One gamer told the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes gambling establishments in the past year after continuing to purchase more coins in pursuit of money and other things of worth.

The Philadelphia 76ers' Paul George is seen promoting an International Poker event

Social sweeps casino Stake ran an ad displaying Drake's automobiles, aircrafts and estates

Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York City Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW's Global Poker

Traditional online casinos are prohibited in all but seven states, which has actually helped to sustain the popularity of sweepstakes gambling establishments.

Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes websites, which do not need normally require recognition. However, sites like Chumba will ask for IDs from players attempting to withdraw any funds.

Many websites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, enable consumers to submit mail-in ask for complimentary sweeps coins, supplied the players follow painfully specific instructions. What's more, players are typically rewarded with sweeps coins simply for signing up, therefore providing them a factor to attempt their hands at any variety of casino games for a possibility to win - or lose - real money.

So why are sweepstakes websites allowed to run in 48 states, while online gambling establishments are banned in all however 7?

According to the stakeholders, their product is the free casino-style gaming, and the real-stakes competition is merely a way of promoting their bread and butter.

'Social sweepstakes games are just a type of online entertainment,' an SPGA spokesperson informed DailyMail.com by e-mail. 'No purchase is required to play at social gambling establishments with sweepstakes prizes. Consumers never ever have to pay for an opportunity to win prizes. That absence of a purchase requirement - or" consideration" - is a crucial difference in between social sweeps and traditional online gaming websites like gambling establishments.'

Think about the manner in which McDonald's utilizes its annual Monopoly game to promote its food: Customers aren't paying to gamble, but rather they're purchasing hamburgers and french fries that use them the opportunity to win lucrative prizes, such as a $1 million jackpot.

And without a purchase requirement, or 'consideration', the game itself doesn't satisfy the definition of sports betting in the US.

'Sweepstakes are an enduring technique for promoting all sort of daily businesses in the United States, everything from burgers to publication memberships to coffee and home enhancement stores,' the SPGA representative informed DailyMail.com. 'Sweepstakes promos are frequently utilized by a who's who of household names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.'

But to numerous sports betting market insiders, that argument doesn't cut it.

For beginners, video gaming attorney Daniel Wallach explains, McDonald's Monopoly game does not run forever. Rather, it has a well-defined beginning and end, consequently suggesting the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant's main item. Instead, the sweepstakes is being used to promote genuine products like fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.

'They don't last forever and they're normally not connected to casino-style video games of opportunity,' Wallach informed DailyMail.com. 'They're just money giveaways.

'The sweepstakes [gambling establishments] have none of the qualities frequently associated with McDonald's-design sweepstakes promotions,' Wallach continued. 'Besides running in perpetuity, the sweepstakes gambling establishments use" casino-like" payments, typically 80 percent or more of earnings, whereas the typical payout percentage for a short-lived promotional sweepstakes is a trivial share of the income earned by the business [typically less than one percent]'

Wallach fasts to liken the online social sweeps gambling establishments to the internet cafes that sprang up in Florida, offering customers the possibility to play casino-style games for real prizes. Much of those brick-and-mortar establishments have given that been shuttered over allegations of unlawful gambling.

DJ Khaled is among several celebrity spokespeople for VGW's Global Poker brand

Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps casinos need to deal with comparable scrutiny.

'These distinctions are not approximate,' Wallach stated of social sweeps gambling establishments. 'They have consistently been mentioned by courts and state attorney generals as essential elements in identifying that a sweepstakes promotion was in truth a guise for unlawful gaming.'

One of the casino industry's leading trade companies, the American Gaming Association, is now pressing lawmakers to examine sweepstakes operators and, in some cases, enact new legislation on the problem.

'Consumers are being denied of defenses and states are forgoing significant tax and revenue chances as this sports betting replaces that conducted through regulated channels,' checked out a well-circulated AGA memo.

And after that there are the complainants who have sued social casinos in more than a lots states.

Sweepstakes gambling establishment operators paid a combined $14.2 million in four separate cases in Kentucky without admitting any misbehavior, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW concurred to pay $11.75 million in one class-action lawsuit, saying the settlement was made to avoid legal costs and continued litigation.

Michael Phelps has actually signed a deal with the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker

In the most recent suit, which is mostly comparable to its predecessors, New York state locals Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both declare to have lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is described in the filing as an 'illegal gambling enterprise. '

Apple and Google have likewise been named as offenders in claims for hosting the sweepstakes websites. But unlike VGW, neither tech company reacted to DailyMail.com's demand for comment.

'We usually don't talk about matters before the courts,' a VGW representative informed DailyMail.com through e-mail. 'However, we keep in mind that this claim has actually only simply been filed with the court and VGW has not been formally served.

'We have full self-confidence in our compliance with all laws and policies where we operate, and stay positive about the future,' the representative continued. 'We continue to offer our free-to-play video games across many of The United States and Canada, as we have for more than a decade, producing not only terrific games, user experiences and entertainment, but likewise ensuring this is done securely, responsibly and at the highest level of requirements.

'More broadly, we 'd reiterate that class actions and other litigations and arbitrations are reasonably typical across the online social video games industry (and the US more broadly), and our standard practice is that we mean to strongly defend any claim which might be brought versus us.'

The problems between standard online gambling and sweepstakes gambling establishments could show problematic for some celeb endorsers.

Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers' George both endorse VGW's Global Poker brand name while the NBA is partnered with standard video gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.

'It's ironic that professional athletes are hawking prohibited sports betting 'sweeps' sites while at the very same time the leagues wish to project a strong stance versus unlawful sports betting - especially when trying to tamp down the periodic gaming scandal,' Glaser told DailyMail.com.

It was just 8 months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter received a life time restriction from the NBA over accusations he conspired with bettors. However, to be clear, Porter's scandal is unrelated to anything involving social or sweepstakes casinos.

Along with VGW, Apple and Google are being demanded hosting apparently illegal sports betting websites

Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes casinos as a significant problem for leagues such as the NBA.

'I 'd anticipate that a league crackdown on professional athletes endorsing sweepstakes websites is a matter of when, not if,' Glaser added.

Neither an NBA representative nor the players' representatives reacted to DailyMail.com's demands for comment. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps also disregarded to react to DailyMail.com emails.

Asked if their celeb endorsers have a responsibility to discuss to customers the distinctions and similarities in between iGaming and sweepstakes gambling establishments, VGW insisted there is nothing more that requires to be done.

'We have complete self-confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial collaborations, and our organization practices more broadly,' the spokesperson stated. 'A few of our values are" our gamers come initially" and" we do what's right", and we put our values at the core of everything we do.'

Glaser, an outspoken challenger of sweepstakes sites, sees things differently.

'Celebrities who lend their names to shady prohibited gaming websites are, at a minimum, putting their credibilities at risk as well as courting civil and class actions by consumers who allege harm,' Glaser said. 'There is likewise some danger that state regulators and state lawyers basic rope celeb endorsers into enforcement efforts for assisting in illegal gaming.'

New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton